Friday, September 11, 2026

'20 Rules for Eating Oysters' — Rowan Jacobsen




















"Get as close to the shucker as possible. Oysters served at places that don't have a designated shucker are often laughably bad. That goes for very famous ones too. These may be great chefs, but they aren't chatting with the oyster growers every day and they haven't put in thousands of hours at the shucking station. If the restaurant doesn't have a full-time shucker, don't go there for the oysters."

Know your oceans

Know your species

Salty places make salty oysters

Follow the frost line

Don't settle for skinny oysters

Don't diss the South

Don't diss the farm

Don't settle for visually unappealing oysters

Avoid dilettante restaurants

Get as close to the grower as possible

Freshness is all

Eat them naked

Know when to ignore the previous rule

The thrill of the chase(r)

Ice is nice, and will suffice

Nothing beats a firm bottom (sand, gravel, etc.) to enhance flavor

If nature doesn't provide a firm bottom, try tumbling

Shuck them yourself

Get religion

...................................

More (much) here and here.

Full Alphabet Written in Italic — Upper & Lower Case


BeyondTheMedspeak: Prescription Creep











Someone I know who has long suffered from serious anxiety is currently on Xanax, Atarax, Klonopin, Inderal, and an SSRI.

What's behind this overmedication – four different drugs (not the SSRI), each of which is intended to treat that anxiety – is how mental health treatment has evolved over the past decades.

Where I had a psychiatrist from the get-go in 1977 (after I recovered from the first of four episodes of major depression) whom I saw once a week for talk therapy and who prescribed medication, my friend has a psychologist who delivers psychotherapy and a psychiatrist who works with the psychologist and prescribes medication – no talk with my friend: the psychiatrist works with the psychologist and selects medications based on their consensus.

Over the years, what with changes in both psychologists and psychiatrists, my friend has accumulated a collection of medications which results in her being forced to figure out each time she's anxious what particular drug(s) she should take at that moment.

This is not the way.

There's almost no chance she'll ever be able to get off this array of mind-altering drugs as long as she's under the care of this – or any – combined pair of doctors.

Thursday, September 10, 2026

'Furious'


This 8-part series on Disney+ stars Emmy Rossum as a young FBI agent tasked with investigating a series of murders of teenage women in New York City.

This is not the Emmy Rossum you're used to but rather a violent and violence-seeking young woman whose history of years on the street after being abandoned at age 14 by her parents once they discover she's pregnant periodically bursts through her professional facade in ways that make her life an unending series of conflicts and confrontation with her superiors.

The first couple episodes were good, then the intensity and spiraling, twisty narrative took it to the next level and made the remainder riveting viewing.

Tremendous cast: the six main characters are great, with Quincy Tyler Bernstine likely to win an Emmy.

Rossum takes her character to a Charlize Theron in "Monster" and "Mad Max: Fury Road" and Nicole Kidman in "Destroyer" level, which is as good as it gets.

European & North American Cities Transposed Onto The Opposite Continent At The Same Latitude














• London is farther north than Calgary, with Amsterdam, Berlin, and Dublin even further north

• Miami is at the same latitude as Saudi Arabia

• Honolulu is at the same latitude as the Sahara Desert

• Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, and Houston are all at the same latitude as North Africa

• Anchorage is further south than Reykjavik

• Reykjavik's average temperature in January is warmer than Boston's, despite Reykjavik being over 20 degrees further north

The Gulf Stream is responsible for most of the surprising temperature differences at similar latitudes.















More here.

There is no such thing as a good decision














Or a bad one.

You make a decision as best you can.

Then, you find out the result.

If the result is good, that's nice.

If the result is bad, that's a shame.

But the result has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of your decision.

To say, "I made the right decision," after the consequences, is silly.

And vice versa.

But there's more.

Many results which seem good at first turn out to be bad.

And vice versa.

Obviously, you're trying to get the best results every time you make a decision.

Which makes every decision the best one you're capable of at a given moment.

And, therefore, a good decision — no matter what the outcome.

On a related note, ever since I was a young boy listening to baseball games, I've been struck by the incorrect ordering of reality employed by announcers.

For example, a guy tries to steal second, and he's thrown out.

Then the batter hits a double.

The announcer says, too bad the runner tried to steal and was thrown out, because that double would have scored him easily from first.

Wrong. Completely wrong.

If the guy had not tried to steal but had stayed on first, the pitcher would not have thrown the same pitch the batter hit for the double.

For one thing, he'd have been pitching from a stretch, keeping an eye on the runner.

And the catcher's choice of pitch called might well have been different, as well as the pitch's location.

So it's much more likely than not that the batter would not have doubled to score the runner.

The fallacious assumption that events are somehow going to be the same regardless of intervening occurrences is at the heart of much of the misery we bring on ourselves and others.

To blame yourself, or someone else, for creating a bad outcome is to ignore the even worse outcomes that were avoided because of the bad one that did happen.

To cite an extreme example: people delayed on their way to the airport who miss a flight that later crashes.

You simply cannot know if an event is good or bad when it happens.

It is only afterward that you assign a value to it.

I offer nothing new here: William Shakespeare, four centuries ago in "Hamlet," put it far more succinctly: "There is nothing good or bad but thinking makes it so."

Wednesday, September 9, 2026

Best News of the Month: 'Exit Party,' Emily St. John Mandel's new novel, comes out next week























She's among my three favorite fiction writers (the other two are William Boyd and Mick Herron), all of whom automatically qualify for SlowRead©®, which enables me to embed myself in their worlds for as long as possible.

But I digress.

I pre-ordered "Exit Party" back in July when Amazon announced its forthcoming appearance and just got word this morning that it will arrive next Tuesday.

w00t!

Below, her six previous novels.

















"Station Eleven" was made into a superb 10-part HBO Max series which premiered in December 2021.

Is a quotation alive?

Oilhlijlij

In a wonderful essay/book review in the February 19/26, 2007 New Yorker, Louis Menand wrote, "Quotations are in a perpetual struggle for survival. They want people to keep saying them. They don't want to die any more than the rest of us do. And so, when they can, they attach themselves to colorful or famous people."

Here's the piece.

    Notable Quotables

    Is there anything that is not a quotation?

    Sherlock Holmes never said “Elementary, my dear Watson.” Neither Ingrid Bergman nor anyone else in “Casablanca” says “Play it again, Sam”; Leo Durocher did not say “Nice guys finish last”; Vince Lombardi did say “Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing” quite often, but he got the line from someone else. Patrick Henry almost certainly did not say “Give me liberty, or give me death!”; William Tecumseh Sherman never wrote the words “War is hell”; and there is no evidence that Horace Greeley said “Go west, young man.” Marie Antoinette did not say “Let them eat cake”; Hermann Göring did not say “When I hear the word ‘culture,’ I reach for my gun” and Muhammad Ali did not say “No Vietcong ever called me nigger.” Gordon Gekko, the character played by Michael Douglas in “Wall Street,” does not say “Greed is good”; James Cagney never says “You dirty rat” in any of his films; and no movie actor, including Charles Boyer, ever said “Come with me to the Casbah.” Many of the phrases for which Winston Churchill is famous he adapted from the phrases of other people, and when Yog Berra said “I didn’t really say everything I said” he was correct.

    So what? Should we care? Quotable quotes are coins rubbed smooth by circulation. What Michael Douglas did say in “Wall Street” was “Greed, for lack of a better word, is good.” That was not a quotable quote; it needed some editorial attention, the consequence of which is that everyone distinctly remembers Michael Douglas uttering the words “Greed is good” in “Wall Street,” just as everyone distinctly remembers Ingrid Bergman uttering the words “Play it again, Sam” in “Casablanca,” even though what she really utters is “Play it, Sam.” When you watch the movie and get to that line, you don’t think your memory is wrong. You think the movie is wrong.

    “For lack of a better word” spoils a nice quotation—the speech is about calling a spade a spade, so there is no better word—and “Play it again, Sam” is somehow more affecting than “Play it, Sam.” But not all emendations are improvements. What Leo Durocher actually said (referring to the New York Giants baseball team) was “The nice guys are all over there, in seventh place.” The sportswriters who heard him telescoped (the technical term is “piped”) the quote because it made a neater headline. They could have done a better job of piping. “Nice guys finish seventh” is a lot cleverer (and also marginally more plausible) than the non-utterance that gave immortality to Leo Durocher. But Leo Durocher doesn’t own that quotation; the quotation owns Leo Durocher, the way a parasite sometimes takes over the host organism. Quotations are in a perpetual struggle for survival. They want people to keep saying them. They don’t want to die any more than the rest of us do. And so, whenever they can, they attach themselves to colorful or famous people. “Nice guys finish last” profits by its association with a man whose nickname was the Lip, even if the Lip never said it, just as “Winning isn’t everything” has a higher market valuation because of the mental image people have of Vince Lombardi. No one has a mental image of Henry (Red) Sanders, the coach who used the phrase first.

    The adaptive mechanism benefits both parties. The survival of the quotation helps insure the survival of the person to whom it is misattributed. The Patrick Henry who lives in our heads and hearts is the man who said “Give me liberty, or give me death!” Apparently, the line was cooked up by his biographer William Wirt, a notorious embellisher, who also invented Henry’s other familiar quotation, “If this be treason, make the most of it!” But a Patrick Henry who never said “Give me liberty, or give me death!” or “If this be treason, make the most of it!,” a Patrick Henry without a death wish, is just not someone we know or care about. His having been said to have said what he never said is a condition of his being “Patrick Henry.” Certain sayings, like “It’s déjà vu all over again,” are Berra-isms, whether Yogi Berra ever said them or not. “Je ne suis pas marxiste,” Karl Marx once complained. Too late for that. Like Yogi, he was the author of a discourse, and he lives as long as it does.

    Karl Marx has thirteen quotations (plus eight for which he shares credit with Friedrich Engels, who, interestingly, never felt it necessary to say “Je ne suis pas engeliste”) in the compendious, enjoyable, and expensive “Yale Book of Quotations” (Yale; $50), edited by Fred Shapiro. Groucho Marx (no relation) has fifty-one quotations. The big winner is William Shakespeare, with four hundred and fifty-five, topping even the Yahwist and his co-authors, the wordsmiths who churned out the Bible but managed to come up with only four hundred quotable passages. Mark Twain has a hundred and fifty-three quotations, Oscar Wilde a hundred and twenty-three. Ambrose Bierce edges out Samuel Johnson in double overtime by a final score of a hundred and forty-four to a hundred and ten. And Woody Allen has forty, beating out William Wordsworth, Rudyard Kipling, and both Roosevelts.

    Shapiro, a librarian at the Yale Law School, is an attribution hound, as is Ralph Keyes, a quotation specialist and the author of “The Quote Verifier” (St. Martin’s; $15.95). “Misquotation is an occupational hazard of quotation,” Keyes advises, and both he and Shapiro have gone to considerable trouble to track down the original utterances that became famous quotations and their original utterers. Keyes finds that quotations tend to mutate in the direction of greater pith. He offers the original words of Rodney King as an instance: “People, I just want to say, you know, can we all get along? Can we get along? Can we stop making it, making it horrible for the older people and the kids? . . . Please, we can get along here. We all can get along. I mean, we’re all stuck here for a while. Let’s try to work it out. Let’s try to beat it. Let’s try to beat it. Let’s try to work it out.” This is the rambling outburst that became the astringent and immortal “Can’t we all get along?” Keyes calls the process “bumper-stickering.” It worked well for Rodney King.

    Shapiro gives us results of similar detective work, and he offers additional scholarly fruit in the form of citations for the first appearance of many well-known terms, slogans, and catchphrases. “This book takes a broad view of what constitutes a quotation,” he explains. The Internet has helped him out, and a lot of the stuff he has come up with is pretty irresistible. It is extremely interesting to know, for instance, that the phrase “Shit happens” was introduced to print by one Connie Eble, in a publication identified as “UNC–CH Slang” (presumably the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), in 1983. “Life’s a bitch, and then you die,” a closely related reflection, dates from 1982, the year it appeared in the Washington Post. “Been there, done that” entered the public discourse in 1983, via the Union Recorder, a publication out of the University of Sydney. “Get a life”: the Washington Post, 1983. (What is it about the nineteen-eighties, anyway?) “Size doesn’t matter,” a phrase, or at least a hope, that would seem to have been around since the Pleistocene, did not see print until 1989, rather late in the history of the species, when it appeared in the Boston Globe.

    There are some neat finds and a few surprises (to me, anyway) in the Yale book. I did not know that Billy Wilder was the person who said that hindsight is always 20/20. “There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch” is attributable to a journalist named Walter Morrow, writing in the San Francisco News in 1949. We owe the useful phrase “Sue the bastards!” to Victor J. Yannacone, Jr., identified as a U.S. lawyer and environmentalist. It was Jack Weinberg, of the Berkeley Free Speech Movement, who first said “You can’t trust anybody over thirty.” Joey Adams gets the credit for “With friends like that, who needs enemies?” The phrase “You can’t go home again” was given to Thomas Wolfe by the writer Ella Winter. It was the wonderful story writer John McNulty, and not Yogi Berra, who was responsible for “Nobody goes there anymore. It’s too crowded.” “I’m not really a Jew. Just Jew-ish”: Jonathan Miller, in “Beyond the Fringe.” And the first person to call a spade a spade? That’s right, it was Erasmus.

    Shapiro has a good ear for the quote bites of contemporary celebrity culture, and the courage to set out on this endless sea. Donald Trump appears twice, for “Deals are my art form” and (in a section headed “Television Catchphrases”) “You’re fired!” Cherilyn Sarkisian LaPierre, known to most of us as Cher, is included for the lines “Mother told me a couple of years ago, ‘Sweetheart, settle down and marry a rich man.’ I said, ‘Mom, I am a rich man.’ ” (The great Sonny Bono, on the other hand, is sadly missing and deeply missed. What about “The beat goes on”? “I got you, babe”? Jingles that got us through some unhappy hours.) Zsa Zsa Gabor, asked how many husbands she has had, said, “You mean apart from my own?” Tug McGraw, asked what he would do with the salary he was making as a pitcher, said “Ninety percent I’ll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I’ll probably waste.” “I ate a whole chocolate bar” was Claudia Schiffer’s comment after her retirement from the catwalk. There are separate sections in the Yale book for “Star Trek” (ten items, including “Live long and prosper” and “He’s dead, Jim”; Gene Roddenberry has a section of his own), for “Advertising Slogans” (immediately following the section for Theodor Adorno, who would have grimly appreciated the irony and probably composed an incomprehensible aphorism about it), for “Sayings” (“No more Mr. Nice Guy”: New York Times, 1967), for “Political Slogans,” and for “Film Lines.” I’m not sure that the sentence spoken by L. Paul Bremer III upon the capture of Saddam Hussein, “Ladies and gentleman, we got him,” is all that deathless, but I’m quite pleased with the single quotation attributed to Richard B. Cheney, identified as a U.S. government official, and dated May 30, 2005: “The insurgency is in its last throes.”

    It is tiresome to encounter, for the millionth time (J. Joyce), George Santayana’s tiresome mot “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it” (manifestly untrue any way you look at it). And it is annoying to reread Alfred North Whitehead’s pompous bouleversements: “There are no whole truths; all truths are half-truths”; “Everything of importance has been said before by somebody who did not discover it.” But if sententious paradoxes get endlessly circulated, that is not the editor’s fault. Wilde was an epigrammatic genius, it’s true, but too large a dose may cause stomach upset. Shapiro is interested in the sociology of knowledge (which is precisely where the study of quotation belongs), so there are quotations from Robert K. Merton, George Sarton, and Talcott Parsons, but relatively less attention is given to other academic figures. (Stanley Fish does not appear, though it can’t be for lack of material. Edward Said does.) There is inevitably a problem in the case of people who are the quotation equivalent of vending machines. Charles Dickens, for example, or Bob Dylan, who is represented by a list of twenty-seven quotations that will seem, to anyone who is a Dylan listener, hopelessly arbitrary. It should all be here, every line!

    In fact, though it is ungracious to say, a lot of the fun of this fun book is in second-guessing the editor. Virginia Woolf’s quotations include the first sentence of “Mrs. Dalloway” (“Mrs. Dalloway said she would buy the flowers herself”) but not the equally famous last sentence of “To the Lighthouse” (“She had had her vision”). Franz Kafka, a deep mine of quotability, has just eleven entries, and it is disappointing that one of them is not “It is enough that the arrows fit exactly in the wounds that they have made.” There are two quotations from William James on the subject of truth, but not the most elegant of his formulations: “The true is the name for whatever proves itself to be good in the way of belief.” Guy Debord, a brilliant aphorist who coined the phrase “society of the spectacle,” is represented only by a late and dubious quotation about quotations. (“Quotations are useful in periods of ignorance or obscurantist beliefs.”) The section for Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.—like his father an inexhaustible fount of one-liners—lacks the always apt reminder that “certitude is not the test of certainty.” The philosopher Sidney Morgenbesser, whose offhand remarks were celebrated enough to have been collected, is here only for his famous retort to a speaker who had said that although there are many cases in which two negatives make a positive, he knew of no case in which two positives made a negative (“Yeah yeah”). Samuel Beckett has only nine quotations, most of them from “Waiting for Godot.” We miss his remark about what it will be like in the afterlife: “We’ll sit around talking about the good old days, when we wished that we were dead.” Goethe has twenty-six entries, including one that was new to me (the attribution, not the sentiment): “He can lick my ass” (1773). But a line from “Wilhelm Meister” that has given me resolve is not here: “Action is easy; thought is hard.” We miss Henri Bergson’s gnomic observation “The universe is a machine for the making of gods.” There is a large woodpile of Robert Frost lines, but the couplet that ends “The Tuft of Flowers”—“Men work together, I told him from the heart, / Whether they work together or apart”—is not in it.

    Poetry is, admittedly, an insuperable problem for quotation compilers. The feeling that the top of your head has been taken off, a definition of what makes a quote quotable that Shapiro takes from Emily Dickinson (who took it, basically, from Kant and Burke, who took it from Longinus—a nice example of the sociology of quotation), is a feeling that readers of poetry expect from every poem they read. They are in the game to look for the strong line. But—and now we are getting to the theoretical heart of the Problem of Quotation—the experience of sublimity is subjective and associational. For some reason, a string is plucked and it never stops vibrating. Who knows why, exactly? Everyone has a list. “My glass is full, and now my glass is run.” “But one man loved the pilgrim soul in you.” “In the gloom, the gold gathers the light against it.” “Led by a blind and teachit by a bairn.” “And softly said, Dear heart, how like you this?” “The waste remains, the waste remains and kills.” “I bleed by the black stream/ For my torn bough.” “There’s a stake in your fat black heart.” “This shaking keeps me steady. I should know.” “Drive, he said.” “You must change your life.” None of these are in the Yale book, but why would I expect them to be? They’re from my book.

    “You can get a happy quotation anywhere if you have the eye,” the younger Holmes once wrote. He thought that you could find wisdom and felicity even in advertisements if you knew how to tweak them properly. And when you start taking phrases out of context and recasting them as quotations, you begin to feel (Shapiro must have undergone this sensation) a little vertiginous. What is not, potentially, a quotation? The dullest instructional prose, with the right light thrown on it, can acquire the gleam of suggestiveness or insight. “Objects in the rear-view mirror may appear closer than they are”: that one has been appropriated many times. Whenever I take a plane, I am struck by “Secure your own mask before assisting others” as advice with wide application. And I have often found myself imagining ways of fitting tab A into slot B.

    Public circulation is what renders something a quotation. It’s quotable because it’s been quoted, and its having been quoted gives it authority. Quotations are prostheses. “As Emerson/Churchill/Donald Trump once observed” borrows another person’s brain waves and puts them to your own use. (If you fail to credit Emerson et al., it’s called plagiarism. But isn’t plagiarism just the purest form of quotation?) Then, there is a subset of quotations that are personal. We pick them up off the public street, but we put them to private uses. We hoard quotations like amulets. They are charms against chaos, secret mantras for dark times, strings that vibrate forever in defiance of the laws of time and space. That they may be opaque or banal to everyone else is what makes them precious: they aren’t supposed to work for everybody. They’re there to work for us. Some are little generational badges of identity. Some just seem to pop up on a million occasions. Some are razors. “I see a red door and I want it painted black.” “Devenir immortelle, et puis, mourir.” “Much smaller piece.” “You’re two tents.” The quotation I have found most potent in warding off evil spirits is the motto of the Flemish philosopher Arnold Geulincx (1624-69): “Ubi nihil vales, ibi nihil velis.” “Where you are worth nothing, you should want nothing.” That’s mine. You can’t use it.

"Language is a virus from outer space." — William S. Burroughs

Pencil Straw

 





















Exactly the same size as a regular pencil.

Plastic.

Set of 5: $13.

With custom brush: $14.

Tuesday, September 8, 2026

If you see this sign — RUN!


















Why? Read on:



BeyondTheMedspeak: If You're Going To Go To The Trouble of Wearing a Mask — Do It Right!





















When it comes to wearing a surgical mask in public, for a while there I felt like that Japanese soldier who didn't get the news that the war was over and so maintained a war footing by himself on some Pacific island for decades.

Since Covid hit in April 2020 I've masked up with an N-95 mask in any indoor setting I'm in — no exceptions.

Lately I've noticed masking by others to be increasing.

Alas, nearly 100% of the time these masks are theater, as worn not nearly as protective as their wearers believe.

Masks that loop over the ears — while much easier to put on and take off than those with elastic straps that go behind the head — always have openings along the sides and/or bottom no matter how carefully they're fitted.

In contrast, when you exhale through a properly fitting mask, there should be 0 air exiting via the sides/top/bottom.

It's impossible to create that kind of tight fit with a behind-the-ear mask, in particular those without a moldable area over the nose.

That's why that type of mask isn't worn in the OR.

If you're going to mask up, get some N-95s from Amazon.

Above and below, my choice.

Unlike the case at the height of the epidemic, when these masks were very hard to find and super-expensive, nowadays they're cheap: 20 for $15.16.














I haven't had a cold or the flu in years, which I attribute at least in part to my mask romance.

What is it?






















Answer here this time tomorrow.

Hint: smaller than a bread box.

Another: no moving parts.

A third: inedible.

Monday, September 7, 2026

Bayesian-Style Time Travel


'Devs' is a terrific 8-part Hulu series that premiered in 2020.

The most memorable scene for me was when the company's quantum computers reconstructed — albeit with fuzzy resolution — significant events in the distant past, that happened thousands of years ago.

This technology anticipated quite tellingly today's rapidly improving AI, which uses accumulated evidence (hopefully not hallucinated) to assemble predictions of events to come.

In the future, steadily improving machines will provide lifelike virtual 3D reconstructions incorporating people of ancient times, such that it will be impossible to say things didn't happen that way.

By repeatedly reiterating these simulations, eventually they will converge on "reality."

The Narrow Shaft — Göran Sonnevi



bookofjoe's Favorite Thing: Dust-Off Compressed Air Keyboard Saver





















On the can they label it "Dust and Lint Remover" but for me it has just one purpose: emergency high-pressure spray removal of liquid I spill on my keyboard every so often.

I keep mine five feet away in the nearest cabinet so there's minimal time for fluid to circulate at the base of the keys to do damage.

Great fun to use as tiny liquid droplets fly out in every direction from the base of the keys.

$5.90 for two 10 oz. cans.

Sunday, September 6, 2026

How Ovenbirds Build Their Iconic Nests


No Affordances



'The Aesthetics of Disappearance' — Paul Virilio
























From the slender (111 pages) 1980 book:
...................

What happens is so far ahead of what we think, of our intentions, that we can never catch up with it and never really know its true appearance.


He treats light like a shadow of time.


Any man who seeks power isolates himself and tends naturally to exclude himself from the dimensions of others; all techniques meant to unleash forces are techniques of disappearance.


Countless layers of ideas, images, feelings have fallen successively on your brain as softly as light. It seems that each buries the preceding, but none has really perished. [Baudelaire]


Paul of Tarsus said that "reason resembles death."


Little by little the rational hoarding, as an expectation of the advent of what is left and a factor of non-surprise, turns our contemporaries into these characters afflicted with fly-catcher memories where whole masses of useless facts are glued together. [Conan Doyle]


You might think of Marcel Proust's reflection on the subject of the Marquise de Sévigne: "She does not present things in a logical, causal order, she first presents the illusion that strikes us." In the sequence of the arrival of information, Proust designates for us the stimulus of art as the fastest, since there nothing yields to sentiment, but on the contrary, everything begins with it.


The world is an illusion, and art is the presentation of the illusion of the world.


To deny the ideal hierarchy of the crucial and the incidental, because there is no incidental, only dominant cultures that exile us from ourselves and others, a loss of meaning which for us is not only a siesta of consciousness but also a decline in existence.


We might also note that the great inventions are events in the order of consciousness more than in science.


Film is truth 24 times a second. [Godard]


[Language] is a component of the body like any other.... Words are micro-organisms, living dust that the electronic revolution only assembles and orders, right up to the differentiated levels of meaning. [William Burroughs]


The development of high technical speeds would thus result in the disappearance of consciousness as the direct perception of phenomena that inform us of our own existence.


The idea of time can be reduced to a point of view: duration is made of transitory instants just as a straight line is made of points without depth. [Guyon]


Time and space seem infinite to us only when they don't exist. [Roupnel]

..................

More?

Your wish

is my demand.

Saturday, September 5, 2026

The Best Place to Hide Money: Conversation With A Burglar






















I had quite the interesting conversation this weekend with a person who happened to be a former burglar. It was great timing because I was wondering if something like the skid mark underwear for hiding money would really work. I also figured that if you wanted to know the best place to hide your money from a burglar, a former burglar was the person to ask.

I started off simply and was not surprised by the answer to the question “where is the best place to hide your money?”

“At the bank,” he said with a sly grin.

When I rephrased and asked where the best place to hide money and valuables in the house would be if you had such items there, I was taken a bit by surprise by his answer:

“It doesn’t matter how clever you think you are or where you hide it in your house, if I have enough time, I would be able to find where you stash your valuables,” he said bluntly. He then explained that what was much more important than the actual place where you hide your valuables is that you understand a burglar’s motivations. Basically, he has two:

1. To steal your money and valuables
2. To get out of the house as quickly as possible with these goods

When you begin to think of it from this perspective, how you should hide your money changes a bit. Obviously, you don’t want to leave all your money in the places where the burglar will first look: dresser drawers, drawers by phones, desks, closets, a safe (if not bolted down), boxes, jewelry boxes, purse, etc.). That being said, you also don’t want to hide all of your money too well for the following reason:

“If I can’t find money and valuables in the normal places I usually find them, I would continue to tear the house apart until I found something. Remember, the first rule is to to steal money and valuables. We’ll keep looking until we find something.”

Your best strategy, then, is to actually leave some money in obvious places for the burglar to quickly find (the same applies if you keep all your money in the bank). This can not only save your other stash of money, but may actually keep the burglar from destroying your place as he looks for where you have hidden your money. If they believe they may have found the cash that you have in the house, they are much less likely to keep looking (remember, they want to get out asap). In the end, if you hide all your money well, you may win a moral victory in not letting the burglar find the money, but you’ll likely have much more damage done to your place that will end up costing you more in the long run.

The next obvious question was “How much money should you leave for the burglar to find?”

“It depends on the area where you live. If you are in a upscale community and only leave $100, I would assume there is more and keep looking. In a different part of town $100 would convince me I found all the money that was there and leave.”

When it comes to hiding valuables, his suggestion is to mark an envelope in an easily accessible drawer or with files by your computer with “Bank Safe Deposit Box” on the outside and a list of items on the inside. This will tip off the burglar that your most valuable items are stored at the bank and will discourage him from tearing up your house looking for them.

So the question of where is the best places to hide money still hadn’t been answered?

His number one recommendation for money was in toys in a young child’s room. As he explained, young children don’t have money, they have an abundance of toys and most parents don’t trust a child around money. Therefore, parents will rarely hide money there. In addition, when money is hidden, it is usually hidden away neatly and securely — a child’s room is rarely a neat place making it an unlikely place for money to be hidden. Plus with all the stuff in a child’s room, it is not someplace that a burglar can search quickly and get out (rule #2).

If you have a safe, it should be professionally bolted down so it can’t easily be removed. If you leave some token money for the burglar to find in the places they normally look for money, then anyplace you wouldn’t normally consider a place to hide valuables will usually keep those valuables safe. The underside of trash cans, inside laundry detergent, inside false packaging (but only if the packaging appears real and is in the appropriate place — “When you find a Campbell’s soup can in the bedroom, you have a pretty good idea there is money inside”) were some examples he gave.

And my question of whether the skid mark underwear would be a good place to hide money?

He laughed. “I haven’t heard of that, but I doubt I would have touched something like that had I seen it.”

You also need to be smart about where you hide the money. He related one time a person had left wads of money inside the empty battery areas of electronics around the house. The problem was that although he had not found the hidden money at first, the electronics themselves were worth money and he took those to sell. Only when he got home and was checking that everything worked did he find the hidden cash. The person hid the money well, but not in a good place.

One last tip from a personal finance angle — if you do hide money someplace around the house, make sure that your significant other (or someone close) knows where your hiding place is. If something unfortunate happens to you and nobody knows where your hidden stash is, it’s unlikely that they will be able to find it if a burglar isn’t able to find it. Worse, it could very easily be accidentally thrown away depending on where it is hidden.

[Originally published February 5, 2007]

Catherine Zeta-Jones at 22















She's pictured here on the cover of the January 12, 1992 issue of the Sunday Mirror (UK) magazine, just before the premiere of Season 2 of "The Darling Buds of May," in which she played Mariette.

kanopy












This is likely my most useful post this year.

kanopy [sic] is a streaming movie app/channel that's free (the way we like it) to all.

No ads, no fine print, no catches, no hidden agendas.

To use it there's only one requirement: you need a library card from a U.S. library. 

Any library.

Get your card out and follow the instructions.

I spent some time yesterday browsing its offerings and they're staggering: thousands of movies, nicely categorized and labeled to make it easy to find what you're in the mood for.

I have 61 films on my IMDB Watchlist, most of them for years: I found 2 on kanopy ready to watch.

Amazing and wonderful.

Friday, September 4, 2026

Things I Always Did Until I Stopped


1. Open the egg carton while I'm in the Egg section to make sure none are cracked. I stopped doing this about 15 years ago when I realized I'd never found a damaged egg before purchase.

Counterpoint: The video up top. More? Here's an article laying out in great detail why you should always carefully check each egg in the store.

2. Buy new running shoes every six months. The people at the running shoe store recite this as a mantra, as if failure to do so renders you more liable to injury and slower times as the soles wear out and stiffen. I call baloney on this practice: for one thing, what about the huge popularity of minimalist shoes? Doesn't keeping your expensive kicks forever as the soles thin out create an ever lower and lighter platform, making you more efficient? 

Counterpoint: Here's a recent ad masquerading as an article advocating regular running shoe purchases.

Watching the wear patterns can teach you a lot about how your stride and impact zones are changing over time. For example, up until about I was around 50 my typical sole wear pattern showed me supinating [more wear toward the outer edge] with my right foot and markedly pronating [more wear toward the inner edge] with my left. A couple years ago I was startled to see that the wear patterns had reversed: my left foot was now supinating, as witnessed by the wear on the outer edge of the heel, and my right had reversed its former polarity and now showed pronation. The older your shoes, the better you'll be able to follow such things and compare them to prior footwear.

3. Religiously follow my car's suggested maintenance schedule, with various degrees of work and expense recommended at stipulated mileages and/or time intervals. Some of those maintenance ran into 4 figures! I drive so little now that's it's absurd to be taking my car in for Service A or Service B or Service C based on how much time has elapsed: an oil change once a year does nicely.

Counterpoint: Here's an article recommending all prescribed maintenance checks along with a few others.

4. Get my hair cut. It was just something I did until about ten years ago, the stylist who'd been cutting my hair since I moved to Virginia from LA in 1983 got into a big fight with the woman who ran her two-person salon and quit and the salon shut down. As my hair got longer I thought about what an increasing pain in the butt getting my hair cut had been in recent years: having to drive into the heart of UVA in heavy traffic both ways; time sitting reading outdated fashion magazines in crummy chairs and sofas while waiting because she was always running behind; never having my hair look exactly like I wanted it to... and don't get me started on the expense.

I estimate I've spent at least $10,000 on haircuts since I started paying for them myself at age 18: that's a very lowball number, it could be as much at $20,000-$25,000. For what? 

Since I started cutting my own hair after the salon kerfuffle I've liked the results as much as I did when the pro did it, not to mention my stylist is always ready and total elapsed time with the scissors is about 15 minutes. Plus it's fun! I use specialized scissors I bought on Amazon and reserve them solely for cutting hair.

Counterpoint: Here's an ad masquerading as an article telling you why you shouldn't cut your own hair.

Who's That Girl?














Answer here this time tomorrow.

'Crime 101' — the second time around



I've noticed that more and more often when I click on a movie to watch, it offers the option "Resume?"

The thing is, most of the  time I don't recall watching it the first time!

I could understand it if it was years ago but last week I set a new record: I was pretty sure I'd watched 'Crime 101' and enjoyed it but I was flabbergasted when discovered I'd written a review here on July 10.

Hey, that's six weeks ago!

Now, I did recall the actors/characters but I sure didn't remember what actually happened in the movie until I watched it again: after scenes I'd think "Yeah, I remember that."

But the spectacular ending? If you'd asked me before I started my re-watch, I couldn't have told you anything about it.

Perhaps I should pony up a few extra bucks to buy rather than rent movies if this is the new normal here.

And yes: I enjoyed the film immensely the second time around.

Thursday, September 3, 2026

The Test of Whether or Not You Own Something: Can You Sell It?























I don't know know where I read what's in the headline up top but I've always believed it to be the very best test of ownership.

For example, you may think you own your body — but using this test, you don't.

Because it is illegal to sell your kidney or other body parts.

For now.

That also goes for movies you've "purchased" and the books in your Kindle library.

I saw the T-shirt pictured above on the Make website.

I beg to differ with the sentiment inscribed thereon.

I can't open my head — but I do believe I own it.

Or maybe not, you tell me.