Friday, May 15, 2026

"Apropos of 'Readymades'" — Marcel Duchamp

Gyujyjuyiuyi

In 1913 I had the happy idea to fasten a bicycle wheel to a kitchen stool and watch it turn.

A few months later I bought a cheap reproduction of a winter evening landscape, which I called "Pharmacy" after adding two small dots, one red and one yellow, in the horizon.

In New York in 1915 I bought at a hardware store a snow shovel on which I wrote "In advance of the broken arm."

It was around that time that the word "Readymade" came to my mind to designate this form of manifestation.

A point that I want very much to establish is that the choice of these "Readymades" was never dictated by aesthetic delectation.

The choice was based on a reaction of visual indifference with at the same time a total absence of good or bad taste... in fact a complete anaesthesia.

One important characteristic was the short sentence which I occasionally inscribed on the "Readymade."

That sentence instead of describing the object like a title was meant to carry the mind of the spectator towards other regions more verbal.

Sometimes I would add a graphic detail of presentation which, in order to satisfy my craving for alliterations, would be called "Readymade aided."

At another time, wanting to expose the basic antinomy between art and "Readymades," I imagined a "Reciprocal Readymade": use a Rembrandt as an ironing board!

I realized very soon the danger of repeating indiscriminately this form of expression and decided to limit the production of "Readymades" to a small number yearly.

I was aware at that time, that for the spectator even more for the artist, art is a habit forming drug and I wanted to protect my "Readymades" against such a contamination.

Another aspect of the "Readymade" is its lack of uniqueness... the replica of the "Readymade" delivering the same message, in fact nearly every one of the "Readymades" existing today is not an original in the conventional sense.

A final remark to this egomaniac's discourse: Since the tubes of paint used by an artist are manufactured and readymade products we must conclude that all the paintings in the world are "Readymades aided" and also works of assemblage.

Written in 1961

Auto-On Lighted LED Slippers






















Genius: wear your nightlights.

From websites:

.........................................

Lighted slippers give you a leg up in the dark!

Illuminates up to 25 feet in front of you.

Take night time trips to the kitchen or bathroom without searching for and flicking on a switch, disturbing others in the process.

Powerful LED lights operate automatically every time you put them on.













Comfortable and convenient.

Lithium batteries included.

.........................................







S/M/L/XL: $23.97.

Sushi Tip Sheet: A Diner's Guide















[via G. Bruce Knecht writing in the Wall Street Journal]

Thursday, May 14, 2026

'ONE TWO THREE ••• INFINITY' — George Gamow





















Published in 1947, this book by a fantastically creative polymath — who some believe should have received the Nobel Prize in Physics — remains a superb, fascinating introduction to the universe even nearly 80 years after publication.

I read it when I was a boy and loved it.

Gamow was among the most underappreciated great minds of the 20th century.

$12.95.

Outline Vase




















From websites:

....................................

• Fully hollow and glazed inside, it holds water for fresh flowers or seasonal greenery

• Inspired by the shape of a water jug

• Made in Seto, Aichi, Japan

• Designed by Yuko Tokuda

• 9.4"H x 6.3"W x 2.5"D

Porcelain

....................................

$78 (yellow roses not included).

Dust Bunnies

Hk

C. Claiborne Ray's New York Times Science section Q&A demystifies these ubiquitous creatures.

Q. How do dust bunnies form? Do they prefer new houses or old? Bare wooden floors or carpets? What can be done to keep them at bay?

A. Dust bunnies form from the surprisingly large supply of stuff in the air, including fibers from clothing fabrics and carpeting; hair; animal fur and dander; and especially human skin cells and the dust mites that feed on them.

Fibers have an electric charge that causes things to stick to them so dust bunnies are more common in carpeted houses, which have a larger supply of fibers.

People shed dead skin cells constantly, so it doesn't matter how old or new the house is.

But because dust mites need moisture to survive, a dehumidifier can help keep them away.

Only constant cleaning can foil dust bunnies and the unseen particles in the air, and that cleaning is especially important if someone in the house has allergies or asthma, because the proteins in household dust are asthma triggers.

Recommended: vacuum cleaners with high-efficiency particulate air filters (called HEPA filters), because conventional vacuums pick up only some of the dust but spread around the rest through the exhaust.

Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Hand Deodorizing Garlic Crusher















Say what?

I like it.

Combines those oval stainless-steel thingies you keep on your kitchen sink solely to remove odors with a real culinary function.

From websites:

....................................

Pulverizes garlic with a simple roll, producing a superior flavor.

When done, simply "wash" your hands with it and the 18/10 stainless steel from which it is made removes the garlic aroma from your hands.

Dishwasher-safe.

7"L x 1.25"Ø

.....................................

$36.88 (garlic not included).

'Many Worlds' IRL












A post here last month explored the philosophical connection between Richard Hughes, author of the 1929 best seller "A High Wind in Jamaica," and Hugh Everett III, born in 1930 and famous for his 1957 Princeton University doctoral dissertation, "'Relative State' Formulation of Quantum Mechanics,'" now referred to as "Many Worlds." 

It was this sentence in Hughes' novel that stopped me in my tracks:

"Philosophically speaking, a ship in its port of departure is just as much in its port of arrival: two point-events differing in time and place, but not in degree of reality."

This morning I decided to try to use Hughes' view of "reality" while I was out running.

As I was chugging along somewhere in the course of mile 1 of my projected 4-mile outing, I tried to "throw" my consciousness to what it would be like at the 2-mile turn-around point near Albemarle High School, right at the stoplight.

I visualized the intersection, where I've been many times before while out running, and tried to forget how tired and hot I was at the moment in the midst of mile 1 in favor of "being" at the end of mile 2, ready to turn around and head for home.

My goal was to bypass the rest of the fatigue of mile 1 and that upcoming during mile 2.

FAIL.

Nothing happened, not even a flicker in my sense of where I was and how I felt at the time.

I do believe it's possible, and so I'm going to repeat this experiment until something positive happens or I get frustrated with repeated failures.

I'm reminded of "jaunting," described in Alfred Bester's great 1956 novel "The Stars My Destination," in which individuals are able to learn to controllably teleport themselves at will.

The thing is, in Bester's masterwork jaunting didn't become a documented reality until the turn of the 24th century in a laboratory on Jupiter's moon Callisto.

I can't wait that long.

Excitement: Elizabeth Strout's new novel — 'The Things We Never Say' — arrives tomorrow














Above, an email that arrived while I was sleeping.

I'm so stoked: I only came to the novels of Elizabeth Strout a few years ago.

Once I read one I was hooked: it was so good, sui generis.

I rationed out those that remained such that I only read one every six months or so until I'd completed them all.

Since then I've always pre-ordered each new novel.

She's 70 years old and I'm hoping she's got another 15 years of writing in her inimitable style ahead.

Fingers crossed.



Tuesday, May 12, 2026

The most interesting thing I've read this month


























It was the opening sentence of Patrick McGrath's New York Times book review of Kevin Brockmeier's novel, "The Brief History of the Dead," and follows:

"Here is a novel with an intriguing premise: that humans are divided into three categories, comprising those who are still alive, those who have died but live on in the memories of the living, and those who are dead and forgotten."

What an interesting way of looking at the world.

As I think about it, I realize that I do occasionally think of some dead people — relatives, friends, classmates, ballplayers I enjoyed watching as a boy (many of whose autographs were my most precious possessions at the time); beyond those relatively few, though, most of the people I've had occasion to cross paths with while sporting my current meat suit are entirely forgotten, and thus belong to Brockmeier's third group.

McGrath wrote that the novel takes place in a city populated by individuals in the second group: "... they're entirely sustained by the thoughts of people still living in the real world."

How is this different from virtual people in virtual gaming worlds?

Are they too not "entirely sustained by the thoughts of people still living in the real world?"

And let's take it a step farther: aren't the inhabitants of virtual worlds created "by the thoughts of people still living in the real world?"

Unless the game creator is dead.

BTW the reviewer said the book is terrible apart from its superb premise.

Still, that premise is powerful and provocative enough for me to go ahead and take a flyer on the novel.

Are virtual worlds real if there's no one around to visit them?

If the world is a calculation and everyone drops dead and there's no one around to do the math, as it were, does the world disappear?

There are many who would say, "Absolutely."

Me, I think there's no more interesting question than that one.

World's Largest Zip Tie














I'm always attracted to claims like this, regardless of whether or not they're actually true.

In that sense my credulousness age is about five years old.

But I digress.

From The Drive:

....................................

Duct tape, WD-40, and zip ties make up the DIY trifecta.

If you need to fix something quickly, and don't have the "proper" tools and materials, zip ties (also called cable ties) are your friends.

Even NASA's Perseverance Mars rover uses them.

And because this is America, where bigger is always better, one company has made the largest zip ties it possibly could.

Cable Tie Link is now selling what it claims is the world's largest and strongest zip tie.

To be clear, we're not just talking about length, although at 47 inches long it's certainly substantial.

But extremely long zip ties already exist for things like wrapping large bundles of cable. 

This one is also cartoonishly thick, and features a similarly upscaled locking mechanism that allows it to hold up to 2,000 pounds, according to the company.

The company also claims its oversized zip tie is "perfect for industrial use, garages, shops, events, and creative builds."

Still, I'm having a hard time thinking of a practical use for such a big zip tie.

In addition to being strong and relatively nonconducting, what makes zip ties so versatile is that they're small enough to be easily slotted into tight spaces when needed.

That makes them perfect for neatly tucking away wires and lines.

If you have a super-sized project in mind, or just have a thing for oversize novelty items, the 47-inch ties are now available for $75 apiece.

Cable tie link will also sell you a 12-pack or 25-pack for $799.99 or $1,699.99, respectively.

....................................












Get yours here.

Japanese Woodblock Print Search — Search 223,891 Prints













"Ukiyo-e Search provides a powerful tool: The ability to both search for Japanese woodblock prints by simply taking a picture of an existing print AND the ability to see similar prints across multiple collections of prints."














Fair warning: there goes the day.

Monday, May 11, 2026

World's Best Party Crashing Technique

S1kmmhjk

From famed party-crasher Alex Mamlet (above and below at parties he's crashed with, from the top, invited guests Steven Spielberg, Penelope Cruz, and Colin Farrell):

Ghgrgfggwtg

"A never–fail technique is showing up in an immaculate chef's outfit — including toque — with a food item, looking really concerned. Security will always let you in. The more outrageous the food item, the more likely they are to let you in."

Kuiljljjik

How do you spell "durian?"

Magnified Sand — "Explore the Hidden World of Sand"





















From the website

..................................

Under microscopic magnification, the unique beauty and individual character of sand grains reveal a diverse origin reflecting geological history and marine life biodiversity.

Sand is everywhere on earth — on our beaches, in our deserts, and on the bottoms of lakes, rivers, and oceans.













Sand particles are coarser than silt but finer than gravel, ranging in size from 0.02 to 2 mm.

They are created when weather and chemicals break down terrestrial rocks, minerals, marine bivalves, corals, mollusks, bryzoans, and foraminifera.

..................................













Wait a sec — what's that song I'm hearing?

Best Book Title I've Come Across So Far This Year

















By Gary Leon Hill, it was published in 2005. 

$16.95.

Sunday, May 10, 2026

Schrödinger's Laundry



















In 1935 physicist Erwin Schrödinger proposed what has come to be called "Schrödinger's cat," a thought experiment which, 91 years later, is still confounding.

His purpose in doing so was to show that the then-new science of quantum mechanics as a theory of reality was incomplete.

According to Schrödinger, one could, in principle, create a superposition in a large-scale system by making it dependent on a quantum particle that was in a superposition.

He proposed a scenario with a cat in a closed steel chamber, wherein the cat's life or death depended on the state of a radioactive atom: whether it had decayed and emitted radiation or not.

According to Schrödinger, the position taken by fellow giants Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg on quantum theory's application in this instance could only be that the cat remains both dead and alive until the state has been observed.

Schrödinger did not wish to promote the idea of simultaneously dead and alive cats as a serious possibility; on the contrary, he intended the example to illustrate the absurdity of Bohr and Heisenberg's interpretations of quantum theory.

But I digress.

The other day I decided to address a couple orange stains on one sleeve of my bathrobe that have been there for a while, from what I have no idea.

I tried to remove them with K2r Spot Lifter because it doesn't require that you wash the article after application.

It lightened the spots but they're still present.

Today I'm gonna go nuclear, as it were, and bring in Zout.

Zout's directions:

• Spray to completely cover the stain. Rub in.

• Wait 1-5 minutes.

• Launder in warmest water per fabric care instructions.

That seems easy enough: here goes...

... 20 minutes later...

Now, what the heck does Schrödinger have to do with laundry?

I was wondering when you'd ask....

After the warm water wash of my bathrobe was completed, I did something I'm betting very few — if any — people would (or would not) do: with my eyes shut so I couldn't peek even inadvertently, I put the bathrobe in the dryer and turned it on.

It takes two dryer cycles of my 1996 Maytag dryer (still chugging along as well as it did the day it arrived, never having required any service) to completely dry the very heavy terry cloth, so after the first cycle I cleaned the lint trap and, after shutting my eyes and sticking my hand in to confirm it was still damp (it was) I turned it on for a second spin.

Upon removing it, with my eyes open, I espied this:






















As you can see, faint orange areas remain. 

But here's my point: while the bathrobe was drying — because I didn't know whether or not the spots had come out —I could indulge in the fantasy that they did come out, which made me happy as I did this and that while the drying proceeded.

If, like most if not all normal people, I'd immediately looked at the sleeve in question once I'd removed it from the washing maching only to see the spots were still there, I'd have been disheartened as I proceeded to stick the bathrobe in the dryer.

Doing it my way, I got the frisson of delight that would have come if the spots had come out, even though an hour later my optimism was crushed by reality. 

If you adopt this sort of delayed outcome approach and apply it everywhere, you life will be better. 

Wait a sec — what's that song I'm hearing?

Qué pasó?


Helpful Hints from joe–eeze: Duct Cleaning — Good idea, or just a lot of hot air?

11111dddddd

Jeanne Huber visited the duct space in a Washington Post Home section Q.&A. which was most informative; it follows.

    Duct Cleaning: Good Idea, Or Just a Lot of Hot Air?

    Q. Is duct cleaning for furnaces a good idea or, in most cases, an unnecessary scam?

    A. In most cases, it's unnecessary.

    The Environmental Protection Agency has been saying this at least since 1997, and the American Lung Association echoes the advice.

    Yet the duct-cleaning industry continues to grow.

    John Schulte, executive director of the National Air Duct Cleaners Association, says that one study found that of the $15.9 billion that Americans spend each year on indoor air services, $4 billion goes for duct cleaning — equal to what's spent on asbestos and lead abatement, and more than the $3.4 billion spent on remediation, such as fixing leaks that lead to mildew growth.

    Clearly, something is out of whack.

    Either the officials' message isn't getting through or consumers don't believe it.

    The idea that ducts need to be cleaned seems to makes sense, especially when you realize that forced-air heating systems run as a loop unless they are equipped with heat-recovery ventilators or other devices that automatically vent some of the stale air and replace it with fresh outside air.

    Otherwise, the furnace generates hot air, which flows through one set of ducts to registers in rooms.

    There, the heated air increases the air pressure, forcing some of the rooms' colder air through return grates and back to the furnace.

    Inevitably, the circulating air picks up dust, hair, pet dander, dust mites, and whatever else is lightweight and capable of becoming airborne.

    The furnace filter is supposed to trap most of this before the air warms up for a new circuit through the house.

    But dust still inevitably collects on the registers (especially the return-air grates) and perhaps also in the ducts.

    Schulte says his association's members frequently find ducts padded with two inches of dust.

    "If you're the kind of person who would leave two inches of dust sitting on a desk, you might be willing to leave two inches of dust sitting in your ducts," Schulte says.

    His point: Cleaning away the dust blanket makes sense.

    But does it?

    In the mid-1990s, before the EPA came out with its advice to be skeptical, the agency and the National Air Duct Cleaners Association teamed up on a research program aimed at determining how indoor air quality is affected by duct cleaning.

    In 1997, the EPA released a 16-page handout based on that research, which was last updated in February 2026.

    It's pretty damning.

    "Duct cleaning has never been shown to actually prevent health problems," the report said.

    More: "EPA does not recommend that air ducts be cleaned routinely...."

    "Neither do studies conclusively demonstrate that particle (e.g., dust) levels in homes increase because of dirty air ducts or go down after cleaning. This is because much of the dirt in air ducts adheres to duct surfaces and does not necessarily enter the living space."

    The report went on to say that duct cleaning could be useful if there is visible mold inside ducts, but only if they are metal or other solid material, and only if the cleaning is done properly.

    Ducts with interior insulation can't be adequately cleaned and must be replaced if they become moldy.

    At the time, the EPA noted that the duct-cleaning industry was still in its infancy.

    So while the report noted a lack of evidence to back up the need for duct cleaning, a reader might conclude that evidence would point out the usefulness of the procedure if only the right tests were done.

    Now, though, decades have elapsed, and the evidence still doesn't exist.

    The trade association, which represents 856 companies, publishes standards, sponsors training programs and serves as a referral agency for cleaners who agree to follow the association's protocols unless they inform the client of a change, perhaps because the customer doesn't want to pay for the whole procedure.

    The standards and training do reflect problems that the mid-'90s research uncovered.

    For example, duct cleaners now turn on their vacuum systems before they begin scrubbing at any dust built up inside ducts so that it is siphoned away rather than spewed into the indoor air.

    There is also a protocol to ensure that every part of the system is cleaned.

    Although there has been recent talk about it, Schulte said, the association has not commissioned any studies to answer the basic question of whether the air inside a house becomes cleaner once ducts are cleaned.

    Given that so much money is being made without evidence showing a need, you have to conclude that someone doesn't want to ask the question for fear of getting the wrong answer.

    Or maybe the answer's known, but no one dares to reveal it.

    Which brings us back to the limited circumstances where the EPA says that duct cleaning might be useful: when there is mold within metal ducts or when residents have unexplained allergies or other health problems that might be linked to dirty indoor air.

    Mold, a term that refers to a great many kinds of fungi, grows only on surfaces that are persistently damp, so if you have mold within ducts, there something is clearly wrong with your heating system.

    It could be a humidifier linked to the heating system, an issue related to an air conditioner that uses the same ducts to deliver cold air, or a leak.

    Whatever the cause, your first step should be calling in a heating and air conditioning expert to diagnose the problem.

    Cleaning the ducts won't, by itself, solve the problem.

    And if your ducts are made of insulated board rather than metal, they have fiberglass insulation on the inside and should not be cleaned aggressively because doing so might free the fibers and send them through your house.

    This type of ducting, once moldy, must be replaced.

    The EPA cautions that there is no evidence to support spraying ducts with biocides or encapsulants, which some duct-cleaners recommend.

    If health problems are what are prompting you to consider duct cleaning, the EPA recommends you visit a doctor for help in sorting out the numerous possible causes.

    Whether you have health problems or are just trying to prevent them, certain steps do make sense.

    Get a good furnace filter and change it regularly, or consider investing in an air cleaner.

    If you have a humidifier, make sure to empty and clean the pan regularly, or have a plumber connect it to a drain system so it empties automatically.

    And have a heating and air-conditioning expert check whether your ducts are sealed so that air can't leak out, or in.

    This is primarily an energy-saving measure, but it also can improve air quality because leaky connections can allow insulation fibers to get into the ducts in certain circumstances.

    For more information, "Should You Have the Air Ducts in Your Home Cleaned?" summarizes the Environmental Protection Agency's advice on this issue.

********************

Well, you're already more fortunate than I in at least one respect: most likely you're reading this before, not after, you've paid major money to have your ducts cleaned.

About thirty years ago, in the late 90s, I got a major home–improvement jones and had tons of work done, among other things putting on new copper gutters, painting the outside of the house, retiling and regrouting the bathrooms wherever time had loosened things up, major tree work to open up the view to the mountains and the northwest, and replacing my furnace and heat pump.

Well, after all that and with a brand–new heating and cooling system it seemed only smart to have my ducts cleaned.

Compssy2

My house was built in 1967 and around thirty years old at the time I had them cleaned; the original owner/builder was a heavy smoker and very frugal and I strongly doubt he ever paid to have the ducts cleaned while he lived here; I'd never had it done since I moved in in 1983.

Long story short: having it done was a huge mistake.

But not for any of the reasons noted in Huber's article.

First of all, the registers and returns very likely had never been removed since the house was built: doing so caused some of them not to be properly seatible again because of the inevitable shifting and settling of the property over time and consequent movement of the attachment screws and all.

But that's trivial compared to the main reason it was a mistake: after the duct cleaning was finished, every time the heat or fan or AC came on there was a tremendous amount of metallic vibrational and rattling noise throughout the house.

By cleaning the metal ducts down to their surfaces and removing the accumulated sound dampening lining, the air moving through them and especially around corners now created a tremendous racket, with the vibration and noise carrying into every room.

Also, the settled positions of the ducts in their mounts was disturbed and thus innumerable new sources of metal–on-metal noise were created.

I am extremely covetous of silence — when I want silence.

I recall reading once that the four most important attributes of a home — or potential home — are space, light, silence, and a view.

So.

My unhappiness from the first time I heard the loud sounds of air moving through my clean ducts lasted — intermittently, because like most things you get used to it — for years, until finally either the ducts became once again insulated with dust and debris or I simply grew accustomed to it.

Now things seem fine and quiet like they used to be.

But I'll tell you what: if you offered me $10,000 cash today to have my ducts cleaned — yes, you read it right, you pay me the money and then do it — I'd turn you away and close the door in a New York zeptosecond.

Or less.

Saturday, May 9, 2026

Apocalypse Early Warning System























Created by Kyle McDonald who wrote: "In the event of an imminent nuclear apocalypse, we suspect that people who have access to private jets will immediately take to the skies and escape city centers. This site tracks this indicator in real time. The current emergency level is reported on a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being an indicator of a likely imminent apocalypse."









Today's Washington Post story about this here.

10 quotes that, on occasion, may be useful

Youladywillpushbutton1


See one, do one, be one.


The bleeding always stops.


It was over before it started.


Look at it in a quantum light.


Money is frozen desire. [James Buchan]


Coincidence is a glimpse of the scaffolding of reality.


The more you know, the less you need. [Australian Aboriginal saying]


A good surgeon never says "oops"; he says "there." [Wiley F. Barker, M.D.]


A client's story never sounds better than the first time you hear it. [Unknown lawyer]


Love is giving something you don't have to someone who doesn't exist. [Jacques Lacan]